Mr. D
Well-known member
What are the pro and cons between Asymmetric Or Symmetric 2 post lifts?
What are the pro and cons between Asymmetric Or Symmetric 2 post lifts?

The Asymetrical lifts are great for cars or vehicles that are also front heavy.
The previous post is 100% accurate. The Asymetrical lifts are great for cars or vehicles that are also front heavy. They tend to leave more behind the lift posts than in front. I have a Mohawk asymetrical and I like it. I use it primarly for cars and they are in the 3000-3400lb range so its more convenient to be able to get in and out easy.
Where are the doors on the vehicle you lift most often and can you get them open?What are the pro and cons between Asymmetric Or Symmetric 2 post lifts?
I really can't figure out what Gregg Smith is trying to say. Apparently they are trying to mount some sort of argument that rotated column lifts are not 'really' asymmetric? That doesn't make any sense. Asymmetric is ONLY a description the position of the columns when the vehicle is located on the lift. Column orientation, arm length, arm position when driving through, base plate or not, and width between the columns are all design selections and characteristics related to engineering decisions, not whether the lift is functionally asymmetric or not....Any 2 post lift that has the columns rotated is not a true "asymetric" lift. It is just a symetric lift...with rotated columns (Which reduces drive through width.). This set-up gives the feel of an asymetric, allowing doors more room to open, but it is not a true asymetrical lift...
I really can't figure out what Gregg Smith is trying to say. Apparently they are trying to mount some sort of argument that rotated column lifts are not 'really' asymmetric? That doesn't make any sense. Asymmetric is ONLY a description the position of the columns when the vehicle is located on the lift. Column orientation, arm length, arm position when driving through, base plate or not, and width between the columns are all design selections and characteristics related to engineering decisions, not whether the lift is functionally asymmetric or not.

I really can't figure out what Gregg Smith is trying to say.
I have a Versymmetric Challenger Lift which is both asymmetrical and symmetrical. So get both. See link
http://www.challengerlifts.com/versymmetrictech.shtml
However, the Rotary vs. BendPak continues be a debate and one that should be addressed.
The following Product Comparison is open for discussion.
http://www.bendpak.com/Comparing_BendPak_vs_Rotary.pdf
Jeff
BendPak

I think it funny that Bend-Pak sells Chinese lifts then notes that Rotary's pump is "globally" sourced! Isn't THEIR LIFT "globally" sourced? Hahaha....
I guess my comment is... compare a Mohawk to a Bend-Pak then say... "I had no idea the Mohawk was so much bulkier than the Bend-Pak"...
I have a "Complete Hydraulic" "Powerrex" SL10000BP symetric/asymetric lift. Said lift fits my 01 Corvette, 94 TBird and Ford Excursion 4x4 diesel.
I havent actually lifted the EX yet, do to tle lack of hieght extensions, but it fits pick up points.
I really can't figure out what Gregg Smith is trying to say. Apparently they are trying to mount some sort of argument that rotated column lifts are not 'really' asymmetric? That doesn't make any sense. Asymmetric is ONLY a description the position of the columns when the vehicle is located on the lift. Column orientation, arm length, arm position when driving through, base plate or not, and width between the columns are all design selections and characteristics related to engineering decisions, not whether the lift is functionally asymmetric or not.
